Page 13 - Flipbook
P. 13

The Pallister Government and private corporations promote a
        false narrative to create the impression that Manitoba’s public
        tendering system disallowed bids from non-union bidders.  They
        complained that the current system was a form of undemocratic
        "forced unionization" and a violation of workers' Charter rights.
        While  the  Government  promised  to  do  away  with  forced
        unionization, the likes of Merit ran campaigns in support of new
        legislation proposed by the Pallister Government.
        Together, they came across as champions of worker rights and
        democracy. Except that nothing they said was true. Manitoba’s
        tendering  system  was  never  closed.  There  was  never  any                         Keeyask Project Rendering
        requirement that bidders on public infrastructure projects be
                                                             Now,  Manitobans  are  being  told  that  removing  market-rate
        unionized or become unionized if they were the winning bidders.
                                                             wages and local hiring preferences will leave us better off. What
        It was more economic sleight of hand.
                                                             will actually happen is that Merit and its member companies will
        Historically, the lion’s share of work at major Manitoba projects  find it easier to pay workers less while bringing in temporary
        has  gone  to  non-union  contractors.  How  much  of  the  lion’s  workers from elsewhere. The only benefit will be to the bottom
        share? The percentage of non-union contractors exceeded 75%  lines of these private companies. Once again, workers will be
        at  the  recently  completed  Floodway  Expansion  project  and  left  out  in  the  cold.  Just  as  free  trade  devastated  entire
        exceeds 75% at the ongoing Keeyask Hydro Project. Unionized  industries, under this legislation, wages and employment for
        contractors gained less than 25% of work at both projects.  Manitoba workers will both take another hit. One more avenue
                                                             to middle-class life will be eliminated.
        Over the years, both Conservative and NDP governments have
        used Community Benefits Agreements (CBAs) to set floor wages  And that will contribute to our anger and despair. At Manitoba
        and establish preferential rules for hiring Manitobans at local  Building Trades, we have made every possible effort to educate
        infrastructure projects. These governments intentionally used  the public on the real purpose and consequence of the proposed
        union agreements to set a common wage and human resource  legislation. As the current election campaign has unfolded, Merit
        standards  at  large  projects.  These  agreements  guaranteed  has  aggressively  advertised  its  anti-CBA  platform.  And  very
        labour supply and also stopped unions from organizing at these  regrettably,  the  Manitoba  PC  election  platform  includes  a
        projects.                                            promise to ban CBAs.
        These were win-win agreements. Highly skilled workers were  When Arundhati Roy spoke of a broken system, this is precisely
        paid standard wages, individual contractors did not have to run  what she meant. The system is manipulated through deceptive
        multiple  HR  systems  at  project  sites,  there  were  no  rhetoric to convince average, ordinary, hardworking citizens that
        strike/lockout  guarantees  and  more  Manitobans  worked  at  calculated efforts like the anti-CBA campaign is an effort on
        Manitoba projects. Everyone benefitted. Nonunion contractors  their behalf. It is just one more deceptive campaign, just one
        were also assured that unions could not organize their workers  more cut, and just one more brick removed from the foundation
        during the projects. Contractors NEVER had to be union; only  of our system.
        workers had to pay dues while working at the project.
                                                             Corporate  entities  like  Merit  have  once  promoted  economic
        Despite  multiple  benefits,  the  Pallister  Government  and  its  policies that gutted our manufacturing industry. Those jobs have
        private sector supporters launched a misleading campaign to  already disappeared. Now their attention is shifting to another
        convince us that decent middle-class jobs for Manitobans were  sector that still provides middle-class careers for hardworking
        a bad deal for Manitoba. They dressed up private interest in  Canadians. If Merit succeeds and Manitoba closes the door to
        public  interest  clothing  and  created  this  false  narrative  in  local  employment  and  decent  wages  for  Manitobans,  what
        support of their vested profit motives.              exactly will be left?
        Merit and its companies have deep pockets. During this 2019,  Next time we ask how Donald Trump was elected or how we
        Merit has continued its campaign to advocate for legislation  became so angry, polarized and distrusting, think of Merit’s
        prohibiting CBAs in Manitoba. Since the 1980’s, workers had  efforts in Manitoba. It is yet another of the thousand cuts that
        been told that freer trade rules would make us all richer. That  got  us  here.  And  if  we  stand  by  for  each  of  these  cuts,
        did not happen. Free trade did create extreme wealth. But that  eventually, there will be nothing left.
        wealth went to a very small part of our population while the
        middle-class size and wages shrunk.


     C A N A D I A N   B U I L D I N G   T R A D E S   M A G A Z I N E                     E L E C T I O N   2 0 1 9   ~   1 3
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18